|
|
|
|
OHIO: Status of State Electric Industry Restructuring Activity
as of February 2003 (source EIA)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ohio | |
| Regulatory Orders | 10/02:
The Public Utilities Commission received Daytona Power & Light’s proposal to
extend its current generation rate freeze from December 31, 2003 to December
31, 2005.
10/00: Allegheny Energy's (parent of Monongahela Power) restructuring plan was approved by the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO). Competition and a 5-percent residential rate reduction begins January 1, 2001. Rates will be frozen through the development period, which is 2003 for large industrial consumers and 2005 for residential consumers. 10/00: American Electric Power's (parent company for Ohio Power and Columbus Southern Power) restructuring plan was approved by the PUCO. Retail competition begins January 1, 2001, with residential consumers receiving a 5-percent rate reduction. More than $600 million in transition costs will be collected through 2007 (for Ohio Power) and 2008 (for Columbus Southern Power). Certain residential customers will have transition charges waived. Also, rates will be frozen through the development period or 2005, whichever comes first. Shopping credits, incentives and switching procedures will be provided, and AEP agreed to absorb $40 million of customer education, customer choice implementation, and transition plan filing costs. 10/00: Dayton Power and Light's (DP&L) transition plan to begin retail competition for all customers by January 2001 was approved by the PUCO. Under the agreement, DP&L generation rates will be capped until the end of the recovery period when transition costs are fully recovered, December 31, 2003. Transmission and distribution rates will be capped through the end of 2006. The plan includes a 5-percent residential rate reduction to the generation portion for customers who remain with DP&L, beginning January 1, 2001. Additionally, DP&L will pay up to $1 million for a voluntary enrollment procedure if at least 20 percent of its customers have not chosen another supplier by September 30, 2003. 9/00: The PUCO approved the Cincinnati Gas & Electric (CG&E) restructuring plan. Retail electric choice will be offered beginning January 1, 2001. The price of electricity will be unbundled into its components (generation, transmission, distribution), and a rate cap will be in effect for five years for all residential customers. Additionally, residential customers who stay with their current supplier will receive a 5 percent rate reduction in the generation portion of their bill. 7/00: First Energy's (Ohio Edison, Toledo Edison, and The Illuminating Company) restructuring plan was approved by the PUCO. The plan calls for recovery of transition costs through 2006 for Ohio Edison, mid-2007 for Toledo Edison, and 2008 for Illuminating Company. Competition will begin January 1, 2001, and residential consumers will recieve a 5 percent rate reduction on the generation portion. Distribution rates will be frozen through 2007. 1/00: AEP (Ohio Power and Columbus Southern Power) filed its transition plan with the PUCO. The plan includes requested recovery of $974 million in regulatory assets. 1/00: Monongahela Power filed its transition plan with the PUCO. Included is a request for $13 million in stranded cost recovery. 1/00: Cincinnati Gas & Electric filed its transition plan with the PUCO. The plan includes: 5-percent residential rate reduction in the generation portion of rates, effective January 2001; rate unbundling into the generation, transmission, distribution, and transition costs components; recovery of $927 million in transition and stranded costs; corporate separation of regulated and unregulated functions; participation in the MidWest ISO; and a consumer education plan. The PUCO is to rule on the plan before Oct. 31, 2000. 1/00: Dayton Power & Light filed its transition plan with the PUCO. The plan includes a 5 percent residential rate reduction for generation; a cap on all prices through December 31, 2004; customer choice by January 1, 2001; recovery of $441 million in transition costs; and a consumer education program. The PUCO will issue comments and recommendations to the plan within 90 days, a final order within 275 days. 1/00: First Energy (Ohio Edison, The Illuminating Company, Toledo Edison) refiled a transition plan with the PUCO to conform with the new rules established to comply with Ohio's restructuring law. The plan includes: requested recovery of $7 billion for transition and stranded costs; operational and technical support changes to allow for retail direct access by January 1, 2001; plans to transfer control of transmission assets to the Alliance RTO; unbundled prices; corporate separation of regulated and unregulated business; and an education program for consumers. 10/99: The PUCO issued an initial set of rules for transition to a competitive retail market. The draft rules include provisions for recovery of stranded costs, corporate unbundling, consumer education, and employee protections. |
| Legislation | 7/99: The restructuring legislation, SB 3, was signed into law by the governor on July 6, 1999. The legislation will allow retail customers to choose their energy suppliers beginning January 1, 2001. The new law requires 5 percent residential rate reductions and a rate freeze for 5 years, contains consumer protections, environmental provisions, and labor protections, and empowers the PUCO to determine the amount and recovery period for stranded costs. Also, the property tax utilities paid in the past is replaced with an excise tax on consumer bills. Utilities are required to spend $30 million over the next six years on consumer education programs. |
|
Investigative Studies |
6/02: The Triad Research Group completed its 2002 Research Report for the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio as part of the Ohio Electric Choice campaign. According to this annual market survey, customers are more supportive and knowledgeable of electric choice because of the increase in advertising. However, customers are less interested and concerned about the "reliability of electric service." Of the customers surveyed, "only 5.1% report switching suppliers, while one-quarter (25.9%) have decided to not switch." |
| Retail Access | |
| Schedule | 1/03:
The Ohio Consumers’ Counsel published its
2002 End-of-Year Update On Ohio’s Electric Market that reviewed the past
two years of competition in Ohio. According to the report, “813,000
residential consumers statewide – or about 20 percent of those who are
eligible to participate in electric choice-actually switched electric
suppliers.” Most of those customers participated in community aggregation
groups. Cleveland Electric Illuminating had the highest percentage of
customers switch to an alternative supplier. 4/02: The PUCO released The Ohio Retail Electric Choice Programs Report of Market Activity for the Year 2001 to the Ohio General Assembly. The report summarizes "the market activity during the first year of Ohio's retail electric choice program." According to the report, the Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company had 50 percent of its customers switch to alternative suppliers. Fifteen percent of Ohio Edison's customers switched, and over 4 percent of Toledo Edison's customers chose another electric supplier. While Cincinnati Gas and Electric, Columbus Southern Power, Dayton Power and Light had less than 1 percent of its customers switch. No Monongahela Power or Ohio Power customers switched during 2001. 1/02: The Ohio Consumers' Counsel released the first report card for Ohio's electric choice program. Overall, the OCC said electric customers were "better off than they were before electric choice." About 15 percent of eligible customers switched electric suppliers in 2001, mainly former customers of the three FirstEnergy companies. In Northern Ohio, 158 communities aggregated their load and chose an alternative supplier. The counsel recommended that the state work out a plan to attract more alternative suppliers in less competitive areas of the state; issue competitive bidding rules at the end of the transition period; develop more conservation and energy efficiency programs and policies; and implement a regional transmission organization. On the federal level, the counsel recommended monitoring mechanisms to curb market power and guaranteeing adequate wholesale power reserves. 1/01: Retail direct access to competitive electricity suppliers began on January 1, 2001, in the State. The first month saw about 97,622 customers in First Energy territories switch suppliers. Standard Offer Rates range from 3.6 to 4.9 cents/kWh in the three First Energy subsidiary territories of Toledo Edison, Ohio Edison, and Cleveland Illuminating. 6/99: The restructuring legislation will allow retail customers to choose their energy suppliers beginning January 1, 2001. |
| Rates | 10/02:
Dominion, a licensed retail electric supplier by the Public Utilities
Commission of Ohio, is offering one-year contacts to residential customers
of Cinergy’s Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company’s (CG&E). The contracts
will end in December 2003, but the offer will expire on November 29, 2002.
Dominion’s limited time offer is for 4.70 cents per kilowatthour, which is
approximately 10 percent below CG&E’s current price to compare of 5.22 cents
per kilowatthour.
6/99: The restructuring legislation requires 5 percent residential rate reductions and a rate freeze for 5 years. |
| Utility Plans | Cinergy
(Cincinnati Gas & Electric) 9/00: The PUCO approved a plan by Cincinnati Gas & Electric (CG&E) to offer electric choice in its service territory beginning January 1, 2001. The transition plan includes the unbundling of the price of electricity into its components (generation, transmission, distribution), and institutes a rate cap for five years for all residential customers. Additionally, residential customers who stay with their current supplier will receive a 5-percent rate reduction in the generation portion of their bill. 1/00: Cincinnati Gas & Electric filed its transition plan with the PUCO. The plan includes: 5 percent residential rate reduction in the generation portion of rates, effective January 2001; rate unbundling into the generation, transmission, distribution, and transition costs components; recovery of $927 million in transition and stranded costs; corporate separation of regulated and unregulated functions; participation in the MidWest ISO; and a consumer education plan. The PUCO is to rule on the plan before Oct. 31, 2000. FirstEnergy Corp. (Ohio
Edison, Toledo Edison and Illuminating Company) Allegheny Power
(Monongahela Power) AEP (Ohio Power and
Columbus Southern Power) Dayton Power & Light |
| Additional Information | 7/02:
The Ohio Consumers' Council (OCC) released its
"Summer 2002 Electric Market Update," which states that "progress
towards meaningful electric choice for the state's residential consumers has
begun to stall." In central and southern Ohio, two competitive residential
suppliers existed until New Power declared bankruptcy. The other supplier,
an affiliate of FirstEnergy, "has restricted its activity to FirstEnergy's
traditional service territory in northern Ohio." Many Ohio residential
customers do not have the opportunity to participate in retail competition,
and community aggregation has been the primary option.
6/02: The PUCO issued their first quarter "switching statistics," summaries of electric customer choice switch rates in terms of sales and customers, for 2002. In terms of customers, 52.58 percent of residential Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company customers switched to a certified retail electric supplier (CRES) while 18.36 percent of commercial and 24.34 percent of industrial customers switched. Toledo Edison Company had 45.84 percent of residential customers, 3.43 percent of commercial customers, and 20.66 percent of industrial customers switch to a CRES. Ohio Edison Company had 16.43 percent of residential customers, 8.54 percent of commercial customers, and 30.90 percent of industrial customers switch to a CRES. Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company, Columbus Southern Power Company, and Dayton Power and Light Company had less than 1 percent switch to a CRES. No Monongahela Power Company or Ohio Power Company customers are participating in the Ohio Electric Choice program. 6/02: According to a press release, Allegheny Energy Supply, a subsidiary of Allegheny Energy, Inc., sold "approximately 45,000 residential and commercial accounts in FirstEnergy's northern Ohio service territory" to Dominion Retail, Inc., a subsidiary of Dominion. Dominion Retail will replace Allegheny Energy Supply as the customers' certified retail electric supplier, but customers "will continue to receive one bill from their local utility." 9/01: The PUCO adopted rules for local government aggregation of electricity customers. Under Ohio's restructuring legislation passed in July 1999, local governments could serve as an aggregator for electricity customers. The new rules focus on three issues: Cooperation of the utilities in providing lists of the customers in the local government's jurisdiction, forming programs for customers to "opt-out" of the aggregation, and the requirments for providing customers with written notices of inclusion in the aggregation unless the customer specifically "opts-out."
12/00: Beginning January 1, 2001, Ohio residential, commercial, and industrial consumers will have access to retail markets for electricity. Consumer education programs are available on the Ohio Electric Choice web site, through mass mailing by the PUCO, and by telephone. 6/98: The PUCO approved Monongahela's tariff for conjunctive electric service, the first tariff approved that will allow groups of consumers to aggregate and negotiate the price for electricity. |
| Stranded Costs | |
| Allowed Recovery | 1/00:
First Energy's transition plan, refiled with the PUCO in December 1999,
includes recovery of $2.97 billion in stranded costs, and $6.97 billion in
transition costs.
7/99: Restructuring legislation enacted in July 1999, makes the PUCO responsible for settling stranded costs issues. 12/97: Stranded costs were addressed in the report issued by the co-chairs of the Legislative Joint Committee on Electric Deregulation. The plan allows for recovery of stranded costs using nonbypassable wires charges. Utilities would be allowed during the 5-year transition period beginning January 2000 and ending December 2004 to receive "transition revenues" or stranded costs under certain conditions, but likely expect less than 100 percent of recovery. |
| Public Benefits Programs | |
| Renewables | Restructuring
legislation includes a provision for a $110 million revolving load fund for
residential and small commercial energy efficiency and renewable energy
projects. Also, electricity marketers must disclose environmental information to consumers. |
| Other Programs | 9/00:
A $33 million electric choice education campaign was launched by the PUCO,
the Ohio Consumers Council, and several utilities. The campaign will include
television, radio, billboard, and print advertising, a 12-page consumer
guide, a toll-free hotline, and an educational website. 1/00: The PUCO issued a RFP for its consumer education program. The restructuring law directs the State's IOU's to spend up to $16 million for consumer education during the first year of competition, and up to $17 million during the remainder of the tranition period. The consumer education for retail choice program objectives include: raising consumer awareness; generating consumer interest in retail choice; building consumer knowledge; providing accurate information; minimizing confusion; and reaching special interest groups. |
| Pilot Programs | |
| Utilities | 8/98:
A lawsuit aimed at blocking conjunctive service regulations was thrown out
of court. The PUCO can now move ahead with the plans for conjunctive billing
service. 12/96: The PUCO adopted guidelines for Conjunctive Electric Services. The 2-year pilot program would allow ratepayers to band together for collective billing under rates designed for the group. (This pilot is an experiment in innovative pricing, and does not allow retail wheeling.) |
| Additional Information | |
|
9/02: The Ohio Consumers' Counsel along with the Industrial Energy
Users - Ohio and the American Municipal Power - Ohio have filed a complaint
against Dayton Power and Light for violating the Electric Choice Law.
According an
OCC press release, "DP&L has failed to comply with a PUCO order to
transfer operational control of its electric transmission facilities to a
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) - approved Regional Transmission
Organization." These organizations filed a similar complaint against
American Electric Power (AEP) in June.
FERC and SEC approved the merger of Ohio Edison and Centerior (Toledo Edison and Cleveland Illuminating) to form First Energy, which began operations in November 1997. In December 1997, AEP and CSW proposed a merger. This merger would make AEP the largest supplier of electricity in the U.S. Approval by stakeholders and regulators, and likely the Dept. of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, is required. In 1997, First Energy wrote off $3.3 billion in assets, mostly from Centerior's nuclear plants. |
|